Facebook Doesn't Own Your Stuff

As you scroll down your Facebook feed, you might see various people posting this gem:

Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: $5.99 to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private". If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste

Better safe than sorry is right. Channel 13 News was just talking about this change in Facebook's privacy policy. Better safe than sorry. As of September 26th , 2015 at 01:16 a.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute). NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement atleast once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates. DO NOT SHARE. You MUST copy and paste

As Business Insider tells us, this is a waste.  Facebook never owns what you post.  What is amazing is how many people cite a TV news broadcast that they personally have not seen.  And posting this notice does not change anything.  The only way to keep anything private is to simply not post it at all.  Of course if that doesn't satisfy you, you might try this little idea:

I'd Rather Have A Waterproof Apple Watch

The Apple iPhone 6s has just been released and already there are rumors floating that the next iPhone model will be water resistant.  To that news I say so what.  If your phone is going to get wet, it is more likely that it will get a good dunking.  Some say dropping a wet phone in rice helps to dry it out and perhaps even get it to work again, but I say don't risk it.

Instead, Apple should be developing a waterproof Apple Watch.  That means you can take it into the pool or shower or ocean and it will continue to work.  It certainly would open up new opportunities for apps to make the iWatch more useful.  And with little cause to worry if the watch gets wet, even when just washing dishes or the baby, the Apple Watch becomes a much more practical device.  Until then, you might just be safer wearing your Timex or Casio. 

Verizon Lets iPhone Users Upgrade Annually

For Verizon Wireless customers, the good news is that you don't have to wait for your two year commitment to expire to upgrade your phone.  According to re/code, "a program that will let iPhone customers upgrade to a new phone every year if they have paid off half of their device’s cost and turn in their old device." Good news for my kids who just pre-ordered their 6s and are waiting with bated breath for the phone to arrive later today.  Of course, given all the competitive offers from AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile, this marketing move seems required if Verizon seeks to keep its customer based happy. 

And who else should be happy, Apple.  With their habit of introducing a new iPhone model every year, with new must-have improvements, making it easier for customers to purchase new phones will certainly help improve their revenue stream.  The more customers capable of upgrading, the more phones that can be produced and sold.  In our technological world of faster and faster obsolescence, we have shrunk the lifespan of the Apple iPhone down to just 12 months.

Is Apple Music Successful

Despite the high competition in subscription music between Pandora and Spotify, Apple felt that there might just be an opening for them as well.  Seeing that itunes purchases of music were at risk, Apple created Apple Music to offset the purchase revenue model with a subscription one.  Apple seems to have no problem recognizing the need to shift as they did with the entry of the iPhone, knowing it would hurt future iPod sales.

And many believe that Apple Music is already a success with 15 million users signed into the free period.  That free trial ends in 9 days and we can only watch and wait to hear how many start to pay.  According to the NY Post article, if a third convert to pay, then Apple Music is successful.  So far half of the trial base has yet to turn off the auto pay feature.  If they all convert, 7.5 million users would make this new business a very successful launch.

Content is King and Howard Stern likes to tell us that he is the King Of All Media.  That being the case, Apple Music might want to sign him up onto their subscription service.  He did wonders for Sirius and could do the same for Apple. 

Another Inane Commercial That Makes You Wonder

If you have been reading my blog, every now and then I come across an inane ad that makes me cringe.  From the 'Vacation' Infiniti ad to the FIOS ad to the silly TD Bank ad.  Well the latest one seems to beat them all so far.  It involves a dad with his young son racing a school bus to get to school.  It seems that driving a Nissan Altima can help you outrace a school bus... WHAT????? The premise not only makes no sense it defies any logic or rational thinking.  Does Nissan want us to believe that they don't think much about safety?  There is nothing aspirational, beneficial, or even informational about why a Nissan Altima would become your preferred car to drive.  And frankly, it lacks any humor to even offset the serious consequences of what they are presenting.

If you haven't seen this atrocious ad, take a look:

Altice To Buy More, Pay Less

The European telco, Altice, plans to buy more cable properties as it grows its footprint in the United States.  At the same time, they have already stated that they expect to pay less to keep costs low and margins high.  According to Deadline Hollywood, that they will pay less for channels or drop those that don't perform.  At the same time, he cites some high wage earners in the company that may not be a part of their future.

Given Altice's desire to become a bigger force in cable operations, challenging both Comcast and Charter for system ownership, more deals could come in the next year or so once the FCC approves the Altice purchase of Cablevision and Suddenlink.  That means that Cox Cable could also be in their sights, as well as Mediacom, WOW!, and CableOne. 

Consolidation might also lead to Verizon watching how well AT&T is doing with their DirecTV purchase.  If they start to see success, Verizon might want to kick the tires on Dish Network.  Of course, there is always Google and their slow fiber expansion across a few cities.  Perhaps Verizon is tired of supporting their FIOS brand and willing to get out of the wired business completely to refocus on wireless broadband. 

The media landscape looks to get more interesting given the involvement of Altrice into the mix.  And new cost structures could lead to a quantum change in channels and services being offered. 

Dolans Finally Agree To Sell

The Dolan Family sure knows how to unlock value. The question in media for a decade or more has always been when will Cablevision sell its systems.  Does patriarch Chuck Dolan need to retire or pass on for Jimmy to let go of the family run business?  But before that would happen, the Dolans would unlock the value of its holdings by spinning off both the AMC Networks and MSG businesses into two separate companies, each still controlled by the family.  And that value boost continues as the MSG company splits into two itself with media and event spaces being separately run.  The result, the empire value has grown and grown.

Today, that profitability continues as the Dolans have agreed to sell its Cablevision business, comprised mainly of  its control of Long Island cable systems as well as Newsday and News 12 cable networks to Altice, a European telco.  And they sell it at a very high premium to its latest stock price.  While Cablevision may have less than 3 million subscribers, its region of Long Island is considered a premium system with the highest household incomes.  It also faces direct competition from Verizon FIOS across the footprint.  Still Attice seems committed to enter the cable media industry.

Altice previously announced its plans to buy the Suddenlink cable properties which when added with Cablevision gives them less than 5 million subscribers.  Neither acquisition will likely bring any cost savings through synergy, unlike the Charter - Time Warner Cable merger.  Altice will likely look for more cable systems to acquire.  Could Cox Cable be next on their screen?

As to the Dolans, the sale of Cablevision might just be a great move to unlock value before the cost of cord cutting takes too heavy a toll. And with their ownership of content companies like AMC and MSG, a freedom to find more revenue generating opportunities outside of cable or fearing moves negative to the cable operations side of their balance sheet.  Rumors are already flying of AMC's plans to purchase the Starz Network.  Perhaps the cash from Altice makes that purchase easier to swallow. 

FanDuel Vs. DraftKings

My sports content is being overrun with ads from two online sports fantasy campaigns.  It seems that every game, pre-game, and post-game has one or the other as a sponsor.  Fantasy leagues have been invading the sports world for some time; we are asked to no longer root for teams but for individuals instead.  And you thought there was no 'i' in team.  Each channel that presents an NFL game seems to have either FanDuel or DraftKings as a major advertising sponsor. 

Personally, I am not a fantasy sports participant, but I do understand the appeal.  It can offer a great mathematical intrigue but lately it seems to be all about the cash.  Each commercial reminds us how much money can be made daily, weekly and annually and parades real people, not actors, enjoying their financial success in fantasy bets. 

These ads are all over every NFL show..  And the NFL seems to be embracing it, perhaps because of all the money that is pouring into the league.  But the very nature of gambling and sports getting tied so closely together seems somewhat troubling for the honesty of the game.  Will it lead to manipulation, scandal, and more?  Are we headed down a slippery slope that could cause bigger troubles?  When ads present how easy it seems to win, we should also ask how easy is it to lose.  Maybe Pete Rose needs to be asked the effect gambling has had on his career.  I'm afraid the dollars being spent to push consumers to bet will only lead to bigger problems for sports and for media. 

Thanks For The Memory

The new Apple iPhones have been announced and my kids are ready for their upgrade.  The reasons range from battery problems to the chic factor, but regardless they both want to get their hands on the iPhone 6S.  Am I made of money?  Of course not and Apple knows that too so with their latest announcement comes word that they are willing to provide my kids with annual upgrades to their phone for a monthly fee. 

So the next question is how much memory to choose and frankly, selling a 16 GB phone is a joke.  Given the number of photos taken, songs and videos, not to mention apps, 16GB is used up before we even start.  And the phone requires unused memory each time a new version of iOS needs to be installed.  Of course Apple makes more money with higher memory options and likely better profit margins as well.  So why does Apple even bother to sell a 16GB phone when they know that 64 GB is more the minimum needed; in fact it might just be time to offer a 1MB version.   Wait a few more years and even that amount of internal storage won't be enough. 

The Future Of TV Is Apps

The latest version of Apple TV was announced yesterday and with it an announcement from CEO Tim Cook that the future of TV is apps.  No longer will we ask to turn to a certain channel; now we can say switch to this app or that.  Not such a farfetched idea but Cook may be a little late to the game.  The new Apple TV will be enabled to offer both streaming content from apps like Netflix, HBO and more as well as gaming apps.  And all will be accessible via Siri as well as a new remote.

But other boxes are already in the marketplace offering both video streaming and games.  The biggest two in the space are Playstation and Xbox while others are enabled for video streaming like Chromecast and Roku.  And others like TiVo try to bridge the gap between cable boxes and streaming.

Still the release of the Apple TV and their new TV app store marks another growth opportunity for Apple.  Because as we start using devices to access apps on our TV, we open ourselves to new screens for on screen advertising, a game that Apple has yet to enter.  Still with eyeballs comes opportunity.  And it potentially could lead to possible e-commerce opportunities too.  That will be Apple's future growth opportunity...advanced advertising. 

The initial success of this new Apple TV box depends on just how cool the interface is, how ergonomic and easy it performs, how exclusive is the content that can run on it, how fast it functions, and how excited people are to try it and buy it.  That remains to be seen.  The potential is awesome.

As to the Cook comment that the future of TV is apps, I believe he is correct.  With content being enjoyed across apps like Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, HBO GO, WatchESPN, and many more, content companies have already been positioning themselves for the app space.  Consumers are embracing these apps mostly because of the mobility and TV Everywhere approach that they offer.  And now we are asking what app are they watching that show on. 

Verizon Tries Again with Streaming Content

For those that recall, Verizon has tried its hand at streaming media already.  Their service was called Redbox Instant, a partnership with the grocery store red box DVD rental service, to compete head to head with Netflix.  Redbox Instant was dropped almost a year ago.  Today, another streaming service has been announced.  Called Go90, it is a mobile app for the phone to stream video content.  The 90 refers to turning the screen 90 degrees from vertical to horizontal for optimal viewing and the GO aligns itself to other streaming services like HBO GO .  But this video service is not built to compete with premium content like Netflix or HBO; rather, it seems set to offer more basic cable type of video fare. 

Also different from the Redbox Instant model, Go90 is being delivered ad-supported, with no subscription price, to to anyone with a smartphone.  While Verizon customers may get an optimal experience, others will hopefully also receive a reliable video stream.  Will Go90 be a cable killer, unlikely.  I suspect that most of the content will be older in nature.  It will certainly help those that prefer mobile viewing with more content at their disposal.  Will Go90 be a financial success; that too will remain to be seen. 

Next Generation Apple TV

Apple's big formal public announcement is still two days away, but rumor, speculation, anonymous sources, and more are providing enough fodder to keep us intrigued.  We expect another update to the iOS operating system, a next model iPhone, a slightly larger iPad (perhaps ideal for enterprise customers) and finally a new generation Apple TV set top box. 

But as we have always learned, a TV box is more than just hardware, it needs content to run it as well.  And for it to be successful, exclusive content that only works on the device.  For that, various articles, including today's NY Times, expects gaming to be that hook.  Are we expecting Pong to make an appearance, literally one of the first games for the TV set.  Or will we get something that makes wanting to play a mobile game better suited for the TV set and not the iPad or iPhone.  Certainly not Candy Crush or Angry Birds, I hope. 

Siri is expected to play a bigger part on the hardware side of the Apple TV along with a new remote.  As much as it is nice to control the TV set from your iPad or iPhone, there are times when changing the channel and using these devices are mutually exclusive.  And switching back and forth from 2 applications not enjoyable.  Perhaps not a big deal but good to have options on different ways to control the functions of the box. 

Will a refreshed Apple TV start to take market share away from Roku, Google Chromecast, or other OTT boxes?  Apple will need more than gaming and the rumor mill says they have yet to get enough content to create a subscription service to match Amazon, Netflix, or Hulu.  To this I continue to say it may be time to buy, not build from scratch.  More will be learned in just a couple days.  Perhaps we will also get some more surprises out of Apple.  And if the announcement excites many, a good Holiday Season may be in our future. 

Hulu Offers A More Expensive Ad Free Subscription Service

How do you like your streaming video, with ads or without?  Most subscribers are likely to say 'without' and Hulu seems to have finally heard that message.  While Netflix charges between $8-$9 dollars a month for an ad free service, and Amazon offers its ad free service, with free shipping, for $99/year, or approximately $8.25 a month, Hulu will now ask customers for $12 a month for its new ad free service.  Of course, if you want to save a few bucks a month, you can still get Hulu for $8 a month with ad interruptions. 

So now streamers, which video subscription service is right for you?  Of the big three above, each offers TV shows and movies and each have their own exclusive content deals; Amazon has Transparent, Hulu has Seinfeld, and Netflix has House of Cards.  And now comes word that Apple might just want to break into this group with a content offering as well.  What does a consumer do?  Buy one service or all of them?  And what about HBO, Showtime, and Starz?

And how do we search and find content that we want to watch online?  The TV Guide Magazine can no longer help us and our cable guide is a dinosaur trying to hunt and peck for linear and on demand content.  Where can I go so to find a movie starring the recently departed Dean Jones?  Who has the streaming rights this month to Love Bug or That Darn Cat or Blackbeard's Ghost?   And how do you want to watch them, with ads or without?

Amazon New Feature A Winner

The worst part of a streaming service is when there is no WIFI or when you are forced to buy it (hotel, airline, etc.)  And it is those times when you rely on it for watching a video or listening to music that the value of a streaming subscription is worthless.  Well, it seems Amazon Prime has heard those complaints and has instituted a new feature.  According to Business Insider, Amazon Prime subscribers "can now download movies and TV shows on your smartphone or tablet for offline viewing."  And it is available on any device, not just certain Amazon Fire devices.  It also means that customers on certain data plans can download content and potentially avoid needing expensive data plans on their cellular phones.  Applause, applause to Amazon for a great feature that brings tremendous benefits to its customers. 

Apple Wants Original Content

As an admitted fan of Steve Jobs and Apple, I have enjoyed watching the company and using their products.  In my blog on Aug 21, I mentioned, and not for the first time, that Apple should consider buying a content company.  I suggested the purchase of CBS, Scripps, or Viacom, but wouldn't mind them buying Netflix either.  Today's Huffington Post speculates that Apple is indeed interested in producing original content to compete in the streaming space. 

In an age of build or buy, I might re-suggest to Apple that their expertise is not content creation.  But they have the free cash to buy and purchasing a content company with both a library of content and the talent that goes with it may be the best means to jump start their entry into the content space.  I've offered a few suggestions already, but maybe another is in order.  I think that Tim Cook, CEO of Apple and John Malone, CEO of Liberty Media might consider some sort of partnership approach.  Both bring an expertise from different sides of the media space and both see a global vision to their business strategy.  A healthy collaboration of content, distribution, and technology might be the synergy that we need to affect a quantum leap in the media landscape. 

Should Apple get into the content business, absolutely!  But I propose that buying media companies and building out a partnership with Liberty might be the ultimate one-two punch to compete in the distribution space.