Let's face it, sometimes it is hard to say no to your little boy or girl. And with the rise of tablets, our kids are sharing with each other all the great content they are watching online. Netflix seems to recognize the value of programming that speaks to the younger audience and pushes their parents to purchase on their behalf. And Netflix is becoming the must have purchase for the home.
So, add another reason why more and more families may be buying a Netflix subscription for the Holidays. "A deal with DreamWorks Animation represents the streaming service's largest push yet into original programming. Turbo F.A.S.T., a 26-episode series based on Turbo, a feature film about racing snails, will be released Dec. 24". And more kid friendly shows are in the works. Most importantly, these deals represent exclusive windows in which other streaming platforms won't have access.
The kid demographic strategy offers a compelling reason for Netflix to pursue. "Subscribers who watch kids'
shows on Netflix tend to use the service more often, (chief content officer Ted) Sarandos says, and
presumably see a better return on the $7.99 monthly fee. And kids often
watch the same episodes over and over". And an added benefit for the parents and ultimate purchaser of a Netflix subscription, no advertising to their children. So given the rush to buy the next iPad or Surface or other mobile device, comes the need to buy content to run it. And Netflix is making the case for being the perfect stocking stuffer.
Content and Distribution - My 2¢ on the entertainment and media industry
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Monday, December 2, 2013
When Ads Are Really Content
Today's Wall Street Journal has a terrific article that looks at the rise of sponsored content. Some websites clearly differentiate what is true editorial and what is a sponsored advertisement; others, have found the art of the "blurred line" between the two. But given the success of branded content over traditional display advertising, the trend is moving more to content advertising. In fact, "Spending on sponsored content is expected to grow 24% to $1.9 billion
this year, a faster growth rate than for most other forms of digital
marketing." It is not necessarily a new way of advertising, but it is seen as potentially deceptive when the consumer cannot differentiate between ad and content.
The success of sponsored or native ads means that it will not be going away anytime soon. Whether it leads to some type of regulation remains to be seen. The IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau) has already formed a task force, according to the article, "to create their own standards." Self regulation certainly beats federal regulation.
The success of sponsored or native ads means that it will not be going away anytime soon. Whether it leads to some type of regulation remains to be seen. The IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau) has already formed a task force, according to the article, "to create their own standards." Self regulation certainly beats federal regulation.
Amazon Might Want Drones Over US Post Service
Just a month after announcing its partnership with the US Postal Service for Sunday delivery, Amazon now would like to deliver your packages by drone service. During this Sunday's 60 minutes, CEO Jeff Bezos announced, "Prime Air,
a futuristic delivery system that the company says will get packages
into customers' hands in half an hour or less, delivered via unmanned
aerial vehicles." Will Star Trek transporter service be coming soon after?
While initially appealing, one wonders just how practical such a delivery concept it can be. Certainly package size and weight matters as does location and assurance of delivery. And what are the insurance implications if a drone fails and falls from the sky, let alone if the package drops. Such a delivery mechanism may be some day, but it is hard to imagine it being used within the next decade. I have more faith in the US Postal Service to deliver the goods.
While initially appealing, one wonders just how practical such a delivery concept it can be. Certainly package size and weight matters as does location and assurance of delivery. And what are the insurance implications if a drone fails and falls from the sky, let alone if the package drops. Such a delivery mechanism may be some day, but it is hard to imagine it being used within the next decade. I have more faith in the US Postal Service to deliver the goods.
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Time Warner Cable Causing A Feeding Frenzy
It seems when you smell a wounded prey that the scroungers come to attack. Once it became clear that Time Warner Cable could be picked apart, Comcast followed after Charter Cable and now here comes Cox Communications. "The frenzy of deal interest comes as cable companies are trying to get
bigger to deal with the industry's challenges, which include the rising
costs of TV programming supplied by cable and broadcast networks."
So who gets what pieces? Comcast would be happiest getting the New York demo and perhaps the Maine system, adding to its ownership of the Eastern corridor. Charter would love to take California and some midwest systems. And Cox might just love to own the Carolinas, Texas and Arizona. Would Charter be open to taking a portion or perhaps they are ready to gobble up all of Time Warner Cable. With Tom Rutledge , CEO of Charter at the helm, and a former Time Warner Cable executive, he has a pretty good idea what those systems offer and whether he is willing to share or not. Either way, it continues to look like Time Warner Cable will be a footnote in cable history in a few short years.
So who gets what pieces? Comcast would be happiest getting the New York demo and perhaps the Maine system, adding to its ownership of the Eastern corridor. Charter would love to take California and some midwest systems. And Cox might just love to own the Carolinas, Texas and Arizona. Would Charter be open to taking a portion or perhaps they are ready to gobble up all of Time Warner Cable. With Tom Rutledge , CEO of Charter at the helm, and a former Time Warner Cable executive, he has a pretty good idea what those systems offer and whether he is willing to share or not. Either way, it continues to look like Time Warner Cable will be a footnote in cable history in a few short years.
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Apple Looking To Kinect
It seems that Apple likes the idea of motion sensor technology that they decided to buy it. Watching the success of Microsoft's Xbox Kinect, Apple "paid about $350 million to acquire PrimeSense, an Israeli start-up that
developed the motion-sensing technology in Microsoft's Xbox video game
console." Not so much given they can use the money they won from Samsung's patent dispute to help pay for it. And with so much cash on hand, they don't even need that.
So the question is when or where will Apple incorporate this newly acquired technology? Will it go into the Apple TV, future iMacs, or all laptops, iPads and iPhones? For that, we will just have to wait for the next Apple announcement.
So the question is when or where will Apple incorporate this newly acquired technology? Will it go into the Apple TV, future iMacs, or all laptops, iPads and iPhones? For that, we will just have to wait for the next Apple announcement.
Monday, November 25, 2013
Cable All About The Pipe To The Home
The future of cable is all about the infrastructure and the wires that connect homes to headends. While first built to provide cable service, it now enables broadband, telephone and cable signals to function in two-way mode. And it has become increasingly clear that the future of cable is the broadband pipeline. "The cable companies — at least in the U.S. — have the fastest pipes into
majority of homes. They are faster than phone companies and have a
deeper footprint." Despite the threat of cable cord cutting, consumers still rely on cable's wire to access their OTT subscriptions and videos.
So control of the US landscape is essential for efficiencies and economies of scale. It also allows for WIFI expansion and new revenue streams. Many talk about broadband moving from an all-you-can-eat model to a utility model based on usage; but, it opens up other revenue streams for security, cloud functionality, and more. And it is why cable operators are circling Time Warner Cable with a possible feeding frenzy over their coverage area. "So the cable industry, if it can consolidate, gets access to the most important pipe coming into people’s homes (after power and water) and the fewer cable companies there are, the more unified the rate structure might appear." Ultimately, a more monopolistic industry with fewer competitors to upend the egg cart.
But will the FCC put any resistance to this level of consolidation. It seems less with Charter, a smaller cable company swallowing up Time Warner Cable; but it raises red flags with the largest cable operator, Comcast, entering the picture. It screams anti-competitive although it is part of the natural industry life cycle till other disruptive opportunities come along. The FCC might just resist such merger talk but I think their best course of action is to encourage new companies to offer broadband access. Open up new spectrum for broadband/cellular and encourage companies to enter the fray. The electric companies already string this country with wires; can't they be encouraged to build out a broadband business. LightSquared unsuccessfully tried to compete; offer them spectrum that works with their model. It seems the best course of action is to encourage competition in a landscape that requires more and faster broadband access, at a reasonable cost. Monopolies set and control pricing; competition lets the market choose.
So control of the US landscape is essential for efficiencies and economies of scale. It also allows for WIFI expansion and new revenue streams. Many talk about broadband moving from an all-you-can-eat model to a utility model based on usage; but, it opens up other revenue streams for security, cloud functionality, and more. And it is why cable operators are circling Time Warner Cable with a possible feeding frenzy over their coverage area. "So the cable industry, if it can consolidate, gets access to the most important pipe coming into people’s homes (after power and water) and the fewer cable companies there are, the more unified the rate structure might appear." Ultimately, a more monopolistic industry with fewer competitors to upend the egg cart.
But will the FCC put any resistance to this level of consolidation. It seems less with Charter, a smaller cable company swallowing up Time Warner Cable; but it raises red flags with the largest cable operator, Comcast, entering the picture. It screams anti-competitive although it is part of the natural industry life cycle till other disruptive opportunities come along. The FCC might just resist such merger talk but I think their best course of action is to encourage new companies to offer broadband access. Open up new spectrum for broadband/cellular and encourage companies to enter the fray. The electric companies already string this country with wires; can't they be encouraged to build out a broadband business. LightSquared unsuccessfully tried to compete; offer them spectrum that works with their model. It seems the best course of action is to encourage competition in a landscape that requires more and faster broadband access, at a reasonable cost. Monopolies set and control pricing; competition lets the market choose.
Friday, November 22, 2013
Time Warner Cable May Have Charter and Comcast As Buyers
It seems that merger and acquisition news in the cable industry has suddenly turned more active with Charter gathering financing and Time Warner Cable reaching out to Comcast about a bid as well. A Charter deal is seen as improving the cost efficiencies of running a cable distribution platform while a Time Warner Cable and Comcast deal is more about gaining a more national footprint. The latter move also comes with a ton of anti-competition issues; "Comcast/TWC would control 60% of the cable homes in the country, 30% of
all pay television households and 36% of all broadband connections in
the U.S., which could pose a very high regulatory hurdle." As Comcast already gets some of the cheapest content license fee deals, being the largest provider, a larger size would have to find cost efficiencies from a more streamlined operational platform.
The Time Warner Cable deal with Charter might be even more exciting for the Charter CEO, Tom Rutledge. It would be full circle for him as he not only demonstrated his leadership skills in running Cablevision but actually came from Time Warner Cable. And running a combined TWC/Charter operation might help him get the next prize, Cablevision, and its Long Island operations. I don't see Comcast making an offer and dealing with regulatory approval; they have their hands full as the largest MSO. But I do think a Charter/Time Warner Cable merger as much more likely.
The Time Warner Cable deal with Charter might be even more exciting for the Charter CEO, Tom Rutledge. It would be full circle for him as he not only demonstrated his leadership skills in running Cablevision but actually came from Time Warner Cable. And running a combined TWC/Charter operation might help him get the next prize, Cablevision, and its Long Island operations. I don't see Comcast making an offer and dealing with regulatory approval; they have their hands full as the largest MSO. But I do think a Charter/Time Warner Cable merger as much more likely.
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Netflix, Hulu On Cable Just Might Make Sense
Sometimes our enemies make the strangest bedfellows. It has happened many times before and it can happen again. When IFC and Sundance Channel were fighting each other for share of the indie film audience, who would have ever imagined that one day both would be owned by the same company. When cable and the phone companies would fight for share, who would have expected partnerships in certain markets. And now we wonder would cable ever partner with an OTT programmer.
Well it just might make sense. The reality is that the programming that subscription services like Netflix and Hulu Plus provide actually augment the choices available to consumers. And especially as these OTT providers increase their stake in original programming. The cable operators' concern is that Netflix and others will drive further cord cutting; but what if adding them to the line-up only makes the cable subscription service that much more attractive. For consumer that seek more, they are likely willing to buy or keep their Netflix or Hulu Plus subscription AND keep their cable subscription. In fact, they just might continue to buy premium networks like HBO and Showtime too. Consumers essentially have an unquenched appetite for more video content. And if cable operators can make its access to these OTT programmers easy, they just might remain loyal cable subscribers, too.
I am confident that cable operators have been doing their research. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that a large percentage of cable households also have a Netflix subscription. The key to the success of carrying them along with their other choices would be the utilization of the set top box and its search capabilities. Making finding content easier and adding recommendation to the equation could make the cable operator the premier aggregator of video content to the home. And doesn't that drive more revenue opportunities.
Well it just might make sense. The reality is that the programming that subscription services like Netflix and Hulu Plus provide actually augment the choices available to consumers. And especially as these OTT providers increase their stake in original programming. The cable operators' concern is that Netflix and others will drive further cord cutting; but what if adding them to the line-up only makes the cable subscription service that much more attractive. For consumer that seek more, they are likely willing to buy or keep their Netflix or Hulu Plus subscription AND keep their cable subscription. In fact, they just might continue to buy premium networks like HBO and Showtime too. Consumers essentially have an unquenched appetite for more video content. And if cable operators can make its access to these OTT programmers easy, they just might remain loyal cable subscribers, too.
I am confident that cable operators have been doing their research. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that a large percentage of cable households also have a Netflix subscription. The key to the success of carrying them along with their other choices would be the utilization of the set top box and its search capabilities. Making finding content easier and adding recommendation to the equation could make the cable operator the premier aggregator of video content to the home. And doesn't that drive more revenue opportunities.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Streaming Content Access Across OTT Platforms
Certainly not meant to be a complete list, here is a rundown of what streaming video access you might find across some OTT and gaming devices as you consider your holiday shopping:
PS4 - Amazon Instant, Crackle, Crunchroll, EPIX, Hulu Plus, NBA Game Time, Netflix, NHL GameCenter Live, Redbox Instant, VUDU, Yupp TV
Xbox One - Amazon Instant, Crackle, CW, ESPN on Xbox One, FOX NOW, FXNOW, Hulu Plus, Internet Explorer on Xbox One, Machinima, MUZU.TV, Netflix, Redbox Instant, Target Ticket, TED, Twitch, Unvision Deportes, Verizon Fios TV, VUDU, Xbox Video
Apple TV - iTunes, Crunchyroll, Disney, Disney Junior, Disney XD, flicker, HBO Go, Hulu Plus, MLB.TV, MLS, NBA League Pass, NHL Game Center, Netflix, PBS, Qello, Sky News, Smithsonian Channel, Watch ESPN, Weather Channel, WSJ Live, Yahoo! Screen, You Tube, Vevo, Vimeo
Chromecast - Google Play, HBO Go, Hulu Plus, Netflix, Pandora, You Tube
Roku - Amazon Instant, AOL On, AP, BBC, Blockbuster on demand, Crackle, dishworld, EPIX, Flixster, Fox News Channel, HBO Go, Hulu Plus, MLB.TV, MLS, NBA League Pass, NHL Game Center, NBC News, Netflix, Pop Flix, Sky News, Snag Films, Target Ticket, Vevo, VUDU, Warner Archive.
So depending which video content apps you prefer, your decision on buying a box for access depends on what they carry and distribute. Of course, with the two gaming systems, you primary purchase decision might not even include streaming video. And as for Apple TV, Chromecast, and Roku, you just might be able to access your video content from your blu-ray player or smart TV directly.
PS4 - Amazon Instant, Crackle, Crunchroll, EPIX, Hulu Plus, NBA Game Time, Netflix, NHL GameCenter Live, Redbox Instant, VUDU, Yupp TV
Xbox One - Amazon Instant, Crackle, CW, ESPN on Xbox One, FOX NOW, FXNOW, Hulu Plus, Internet Explorer on Xbox One, Machinima, MUZU.TV, Netflix, Redbox Instant, Target Ticket, TED, Twitch, Unvision Deportes, Verizon Fios TV, VUDU, Xbox Video
Apple TV - iTunes, Crunchyroll, Disney, Disney Junior, Disney XD, flicker, HBO Go, Hulu Plus, MLB.TV, MLS, NBA League Pass, NHL Game Center, Netflix, PBS, Qello, Sky News, Smithsonian Channel, Watch ESPN, Weather Channel, WSJ Live, Yahoo! Screen, You Tube, Vevo, Vimeo
Chromecast - Google Play, HBO Go, Hulu Plus, Netflix, Pandora, You Tube
Roku - Amazon Instant, AOL On, AP, BBC, Blockbuster on demand, Crackle, dishworld, EPIX, Flixster, Fox News Channel, HBO Go, Hulu Plus, MLB.TV, MLS, NBA League Pass, NHL Game Center, NBC News, Netflix, Pop Flix, Sky News, Snag Films, Target Ticket, Vevo, VUDU, Warner Archive.
So depending which video content apps you prefer, your decision on buying a box for access depends on what they carry and distribute. Of course, with the two gaming systems, you primary purchase decision might not even include streaming video. And as for Apple TV, Chromecast, and Roku, you just might be able to access your video content from your blu-ray player or smart TV directly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)