Content and Distribution - My 2¢ on the entertainment and media industry
Thursday, July 26, 2012
BSkyB Banking On Over The Top
The truth is that if you can't beat em, join em. The rise of broadband and the fear of consumers switching to IPTV devices has cause BSkyB to consider new distribution strategies. "BSkyB will spend £30 million cutting its own cord through Now TV". The truth is clear; why let other platforms take away this audience, better to have a presence in the OTT space too. "That gives us a clue how much BSkyB is investing to protect its heavyweight satellite and triple-play offering from disruption by new over-the-top (OTT), cord-cutting services and platforms, and to seek new online customers". As a new platform it also allows more flexibility to create a low cost package of service and support a consumer preference to a la carte offerings. From my vantage point, it is a very smart move.
What Is A Radio Shack?
Sad to say but it looks like another institution is on a path toward closure. It seems that Radio Shack has not changed with the times. We no longer build radios in our basement, we no longer seek wires and connections; technology has changed the process and Radio Shack has become less relevant. Today it tries to compete with wireless phone stores, big box electronic companies, and even some toy stores; but what is Radio Shack?
"While RadioShack is suffering from industry-wide trends — including declining TV sales and consumers using their smartphones to compare prices, as well as an uncertain economy where shoppers shun spending on high-ticket items — analysts said the company has made several mistakes." To me, the biggest one is its name. It no longer connotes innovation but reminds us of older technology. Second, it neither offers any real differentiated product or better price point to challenge its various competitors. And third, its merchandise consists of an "'overloaded product assortment,' including 'obscure items' such as magnifying glasses and soldering irons that make its stores hard to shop." So frankly, the question to ask is, can Radio Shack be saved.
For one, a name change couldn't hurt, one that resonates a more future technologist approach. A better mix of merchandise especially in the mobile and web space. Build out an exclusive product line at a competitive price point. And less reliance on big screen products that need larger merchandise layouts than Radio Shack can offer. Perhaps its time for "The Web Shack" or Tech Shack" or "Digital Shack' to emerge.
"While RadioShack is suffering from industry-wide trends — including declining TV sales and consumers using their smartphones to compare prices, as well as an uncertain economy where shoppers shun spending on high-ticket items — analysts said the company has made several mistakes." To me, the biggest one is its name. It no longer connotes innovation but reminds us of older technology. Second, it neither offers any real differentiated product or better price point to challenge its various competitors. And third, its merchandise consists of an "'overloaded product assortment,' including 'obscure items' such as magnifying glasses and soldering irons that make its stores hard to shop." So frankly, the question to ask is, can Radio Shack be saved.
For one, a name change couldn't hurt, one that resonates a more future technologist approach. A better mix of merchandise especially in the mobile and web space. Build out an exclusive product line at a competitive price point. And less reliance on big screen products that need larger merchandise layouts than Radio Shack can offer. Perhaps its time for "The Web Shack" or Tech Shack" or "Digital Shack' to emerge.
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Do We Expect Too Much From Apple?
Apple released their quarterly earnings last night and the analysts were disappointed in the actual verse estimate. Despite rising year over year, it just wasn't good enough. The challenge may be in what lens we look at companies like Apple. Is it fair to look at it so closely over a quarter, especially when product life cycles and new release dates can significantly affect short term buying behavior. I mean why buy a new iPhone today when the rumors of a new model before end of year causes us to wit on the sidelines to wait. And once the new iPhone, new iPad, and other releases occur, won't they tend to send unit sales through the roof. I mean the first week of a movie release is always higher than the 5th week.
Financially, Apple is still a rising star. And while the short term bump on the stock price is part of the game, Apple continues to impress in the long run. Knowing that there is product to be released, seeing how well the iTunes business grows as a result of these sales, and the impact Apple has on other companies and businesses, I still believe that Apple is a long term play.
Financially, Apple is still a rising star. And while the short term bump on the stock price is part of the game, Apple continues to impress in the long run. Knowing that there is product to be released, seeing how well the iTunes business grows as a result of these sales, and the impact Apple has on other companies and businesses, I still believe that Apple is a long term play.
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Never Ending Saga - Content And Cable Distribution Clash Again
Just as the Time Warner Cable and Hearst broadcast agreement has settled comes word that a next fight is brewing. This time it is between Time Warner Cable and Meredith Broadcast networks. "On Wednesday the cable company could lose the CBS and MyNetworkTV affiliates in Kansas City, an NBC station in Nashville, and a CBS outlet in Springfield, Mass. if the companies don’t resolve their contract dispute." And if it follows the same script, the stations will go dark for a period of time, negative advertising will emerge, websites will arise to send nasty messages to each party, and ultimately an agreement will be reached. Unfortunately, we must watch all the nasty stuff first before either party will get to the conclusion; it starts to sound like a bad sitcom.
Going To The Movies Not So Worth It
Here's a basic question, are you going to the movies more or less times than you went say last year or 5 years ago. Does the movie experience or interest in a title push you to go out and would you be willing to go back to see the same film again and again? It seems that the cost of going to the movies, coupled with much shorter distribution windows and better home viewing experiences has hurt attendance. "Attendance at the movies last year was the lowest since 1995, and per-person attendance fell to a 25-year low — in particular among younger consumers who frequent the cinema most often, a new report shows." 3D movies have grown, but the cost to watch and the experience in general underwhelms. Imax screens help, but there are few around to make them convenient to the masses. And the price to watch and the cost of refreshments make the total cost a bigger drain on the pocket books.
On the other hand, films released early in the year are accessible through on demand or online in less than a year. With vastly improved HD TV sets and high resolution iPads, the cost is much less and the enjoyment more. For a family of 4, a night out at the movies with popcorn is more than $60; the cost to watch on VOD with a microwave popcorn bowl, under $10. It is that growing chasm between the two choices in a depressed economy that strikes at the nerve of the movie industry. When going to the movies becomes a more special experience, we go less and expect much more in return.
"Back in 2002, the average moviegoer went to the theater eight times a year; last year, it was fewer than six. In particular, younger viewers are going to movies less often. Attendance per person for consumers ages 12 to 24 is down 40 percent since 2002." Blockbusters try to help, but the rising costs limit how many we choose to watch. This trend is not limited to movie theaters. Look at professional sports and see how few seats are being sold. Yankee stadium as an example has rows and rows of seats empty; the New York Jets face similar issues trying to sell out its stadium. As costs rise, less people can afford to go. And once they begin to switch their viewing behavior, it becomes more difficult to win them back to your venue.
On the other hand, films released early in the year are accessible through on demand or online in less than a year. With vastly improved HD TV sets and high resolution iPads, the cost is much less and the enjoyment more. For a family of 4, a night out at the movies with popcorn is more than $60; the cost to watch on VOD with a microwave popcorn bowl, under $10. It is that growing chasm between the two choices in a depressed economy that strikes at the nerve of the movie industry. When going to the movies becomes a more special experience, we go less and expect much more in return.
"Back in 2002, the average moviegoer went to the theater eight times a year; last year, it was fewer than six. In particular, younger viewers are going to movies less often. Attendance per person for consumers ages 12 to 24 is down 40 percent since 2002." Blockbusters try to help, but the rising costs limit how many we choose to watch. This trend is not limited to movie theaters. Look at professional sports and see how few seats are being sold. Yankee stadium as an example has rows and rows of seats empty; the New York Jets face similar issues trying to sell out its stadium. As costs rise, less people can afford to go. And once they begin to switch their viewing behavior, it becomes more difficult to win them back to your venue.
Monday, July 23, 2012
The Fall And Rise Of Yahoo!
Yahoo! has had some very public struggles lately. But with the hiring of former Google exec, Marissa Mayer, we may start to refocus on the value that Yahoo! brings to the web. Some may question what Yahoo! stands for today, but the more important question will be what does Yahoo! want to be. Ad Age has it right. "Yahoo needed to be a product company again, and media alone isn't a good enough product. Rather, Yahoo needs to build the tools and services that bind its 700 million users into its world, services such as Mail, Yahoo Finance and Sports. The debate of Yahoo as a tech company vs. a media company has been settled: It must be both."
Despite their failings, viewers still use their services; for me it is finance, sports, and news. Continuing to push their content and their strengths as aggregators of content means we will still seek them out for our information. But more is needed to drive use.Ad Age notes need to improve the homepage and mail. "With those two products growing increasingly stale, and today's youngest generation of internet user gravitating toward social networks instead of portal pages or even email, Yahoo is facing a not-so-distant future in which it'll need to replace the core traffic-driving engines that create value in its media properties." Whether it through acquisition or refresh, Yahoo! needs to focus on matching itself to the future - from better mobile deployment and tablet usage to a best social network experience.
Can Yahoo! do it? I think with the right leadership and renewed investment, the answer is a resounding yes.
Despite their failings, viewers still use their services; for me it is finance, sports, and news. Continuing to push their content and their strengths as aggregators of content means we will still seek them out for our information. But more is needed to drive use.Ad Age notes need to improve the homepage and mail. "With those two products growing increasingly stale, and today's youngest generation of internet user gravitating toward social networks instead of portal pages or even email, Yahoo is facing a not-so-distant future in which it'll need to replace the core traffic-driving engines that create value in its media properties." Whether it through acquisition or refresh, Yahoo! needs to focus on matching itself to the future - from better mobile deployment and tablet usage to a best social network experience.
Can Yahoo! do it? I think with the right leadership and renewed investment, the answer is a resounding yes.
Sunday, July 22, 2012
Murdoch Resigns From Newspaper Boards
Ahead of the split of News Corp of broadcasting from print businesses, Rupert Murdoch has decided to resign from a number of British Newspaper boards. "According to company officials who claim to be familiar with his thinking, the scandal has convinced Mr. Murdoch that the British newspapers, including The Times and The Sunday Times, which have been racking up tens of millions of dollars in losses in recent years, have become a financial and reputational drag on the News Corporation’s other holdings." Whether it is also about removing himself further from the earlier hacking charges leveled on his publications, one can only assume that there is some connection. The more separate he can become the lesser the stink.
Certainly these charges have seriously affected his ability to grow his media empire. Rather than consider purchasing BSkyB, Murdoch has become a seller. "The abandonment of a $12 billion offer to acquire the remaining shares in the company, announced as the phone hacking scandal grew last year, was part of the heavy price the Murdochs have paid for the tabloid scandal." Once the empire has been pared back and the hacking drama has dies down, perhaps their investment in US businesses will increase.
Certainly these charges have seriously affected his ability to grow his media empire. Rather than consider purchasing BSkyB, Murdoch has become a seller. "The abandonment of a $12 billion offer to acquire the remaining shares in the company, announced as the phone hacking scandal grew last year, was part of the heavy price the Murdochs have paid for the tabloid scandal." Once the empire has been pared back and the hacking drama has dies down, perhaps their investment in US businesses will increase.
Friday, July 20, 2012
DirecTV and Viacom Renew Their Vows
Someone blinked. While deal terms were not announced, it is logical to expect that they did indeed rise and will continue to increase over the course of the new deal. Consumers who subscribe to DirecTV will once again get their MTV, Comedy Central, and their Nickelodeon, and eventually find themselves paying more on their bills. Cable and satellite multi-video program distributors (MVPD) are still the primary aggregators for linear content. And while they may temporarily drop a network or two, ultimately they still find themselves needing to carry everything. At the same time, the growing costs of carriage may cause the subsequent rising consumer fees to further push consumers to cut the cord.
For DirecTV the new deal assures them programming for authenticated viewers in a TV Everywhere world. "DirecTV subscribers will also be able to see Viacom shows on tablets, laptops and other devices using DirecTV's Everywhere platform." One deal done. Now we can focus on Dish and AMC, Hearst and Time Warner Cable.
REVISED: Hearst and Time Warner Cable have just agreed to terms. Per Multichannel, the blackout has been lifted.
For DirecTV the new deal assures them programming for authenticated viewers in a TV Everywhere world. "DirecTV subscribers will also be able to see Viacom shows on tablets, laptops and other devices using DirecTV's Everywhere platform." One deal done. Now we can focus on Dish and AMC, Hearst and Time Warner Cable.
REVISED: Hearst and Time Warner Cable have just agreed to terms. Per Multichannel, the blackout has been lifted.
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Should Facebook Buy Blackberry
Not my idea but I am certainly keen to it. Gary makes a great point, no one remembers phone numbers anymore. I couldn't agree more. Listen to his vlog and see if you agree with his idea for Facebook to buy RIM and Blackberry.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)