Is LightSquared about political and personal fortune at the expense of the public, or are they truly wanting to build a better mousetrap that will improve connectivity and give consumers another choice? "LightSquared wants to build a network with 40,000 towers across the U.S. using spectrum that was originally set aside for satellite phones. Rather than selling cellphone service directly to consumers, the company plans to offer its network to other wireless carriers and companies such as Best Buy Co."
The 21st Century could soon be declared the beginning of the connected consumer. We feel the need to be connected via the web, whether we are in our house or on an airplane, at the supermarket or riding the subway. And when we are not connected, we feel a loss, unable to make a call, send a tweet, play a game of Words With Friends. Connectivity could soon be declared a required right like food, shelter, and clothing.
Seriously, the need for connectivity, at a low cost, makes the entry of LightSquared an important competitor in what has slowly become a limited market of players. That their entry occurs without interfering with other GPS signals and affecting safety is essential. And lastly, that the politics of lobbying and electorial support can be withdrawn so that the true opportunity for the economics of business to take control. "The debate heated up when the Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit investigative news organization, published White House emails showing LightSquared officials boasting of campaign donations while trying to schedule meetings with White House officials." This may be "business as usual", but it would be best to remove the politics and let the consumer push for LightSquared support.
The need for more broadband and wireless players in the market is essential. With AT&T's desire to purchase T-Mobile and the cable companies continuing to converge, LightSquared could be a well needed player. Get the technology right and let free market rule,
No comments:
Post a Comment